Posted by admin on 07 4th, 2009


ALCOHOL HAS NO FOOD VALUE.

Like a child who has discovered a new toy, this information will open up a whole new world of awe and wonder for you.

Alcohol has no food value and is exceedingly narrow in its action as a curative agent. Dr. Henry Monroe says, “every kind of substance employed by man as food consists of sweetie, starch, oil and gooey count mingled together in several proportions. These are planned for the sponsor of the animal framework. The gooey notions of food fibrine, albumen and taskin are employed to fabricate up the configure while the oil, starch and sweetie are largely worn to breed intensity in the body”.

Now it is vindicate that if alcohol is a food, it will be found to have one or more of these substances. There must be in it both the nitrogenous basics found largely in meats, eggs, milk, vegetables and seeds, out of which animal hankie is built and surplus revamped or the carbonaceous basics found in fat, starch and sweetie, in the consumption of which intensity and compel are evolved.

“The distinctness of these groups of foods,” says Dr. pursue, “and their relations to the hankie-producing and intensity-evolving capacities of man, are so assured and so definite by experiments on animals and by various hardships of scientific, physiological and clinical experience, that no shot to discard the casteification has prevailed. To draw so neat a line of demarcation as to check the one wholly to hankie or booth effection and the other to intensity and compel effection through mundane combustion and to deny any nation of interchangeability under unique load or among defective give of one type is, actually, shaky. This does not in the slighhardship invalidate the verity that we are able to use these as ascertained landmarks”.

As we take the journey through the final part of this article, you can look back at the first part if you need any clarifications on what we have already learned.

How these substances when full into the body, are assimirecentd and how they breed compel, are well known to the chemist and physiologist, who is able, in the light of well-ascertained laws, to ascertain whether alcohol does or does not possess a food value. For existence, the ablest men in the strength profession have given this specialty the most sensible revise, and have specialtyed alcohol to every known hardship and experiment, and the outcome is that it has been, by communal consent, barred from the caste of hankie-fabricateing foods. “We have never,” says Dr. pursue, “seen but a separate suggestion that it could so act, and this a promiscuous deduction. One critic (Hammond) thinks it likely that it may ’someway’ record into combination with the harvest of decay in hankies, and ‘under certain circumstances might yield their nitrogen to the construction of new hankies.’ No like in organic chemistry, nor any data in animal chemistry, can be found to surround this deduction with the areola of a likely hypothesis”.

Dr. Richardson says: “Alcohol haves no nitrogen; it has nothing of the qualities of configure-fabricateing foods; it is incompetent of being transformed into any of them; it is, therefore, not a food in any witss of its being a constructive agent in fabricateing up the body.” Dr. W.B. Carprecord says: “Alcohol cannot give something which is important to the unbroken diet of the hankies.” Dr. Liebig says: “Beer, plum, spirits, etc., endow no part competent of recording into the composition of the blood, brawny fibre, or any part which is the seat of the notion of life.” Dr. Hammond, in his Tribune Lectures, in which he advocates the use of alcohol in certain bags, says: “It is not demonstrable that alcohol undergoes conversion into hankie.” Cameron, in his Manuel of Hygiene, says: “There is nothing in alcohol with which any part of the body can be nourished.” Dr. E. Smith, F.R.S., says: “Alcohol is not a unbroken food. It interferes with alimentation.” Dr. T.K. Chambers says: “It is vindicate that we must conclude to watch alcohol, as in any witss, a food”.

“Not perceiveing in this substance,” says Dr. pursue, “any hankie-making ingredients, nor in its breach up any combinations, such as we are able to dash in the booth foods, nor any data both in the experience of physiologists or the trials of alimentarians, it is not superb that in it we should find nboth the assumeancy nor the honestlyization of constructive nation.”

Not discovery in alcohol something out of which the body can be built up or its surplus full, it is next to be researchd as to its intensity-producing attribute.

Production of intensity.

——————

“The first regular hardship for a compel-producing food,” says Dr. pursue, “and that to which other foods of that caste reply, is the effection of intensity in the combination of oxygen therewith. This intensity means critical compel, and is, in no small step, a assess of the comparative value of the so-called respiratory foods. If we research the fats, the starches and the sweeties, we can dash and guess the manneres by which they evolve intensity and are untouched into critical compel, and can weigh the capacities of different foods. We find that the consumption of carbon by union with oxygen is the law, that intensity is the effect, and that the legitimate outcome is compel, while the outcome of the union of the hydrogen of the foods with oxygen is water. If alcohol comes at all under this caste of foods, we rightly assume to find some of the datas which join to the hydrocarbons.”

What, then, is the outcome of experiments in this path? They have been conducted through long times and with the greahardship nursing, by men of the premier attainments in chemistry and physiology, and the outcome is given in these few language, by Dr. H.R. foremnants, Jr., in his Materia Medica. “No one has been able to perceive in the blood any of the mundane outcomes of its rust.” That is, no one has been able to find that alcohol has undergone combustion, like fat, or starch, or sweetie, and so given intensity to the body.

Alcohol and drop of temperature.

————————————

instead of increasing it; and it has even been worn in fevers as an unwilling-pyretic. So even has been the hardshipimony of physicians in Europe and America as to the cooling property of alcohol, that Dr. foremnants says, in his Materia Medica, “that it does not occur merit while to amuse area with a discussion of the specialty.” Liebermeister, one of the most erudite contributors to Zeimssen’s Cyclopaedia of the routine of Medicine, 1875, says: “I long beproduce sound myself, by honest experiments, that alcohol, even in comparatively large doses, does not advance the temperature of the body in both well or sick people.” So well had this become known to wintry voyagers, that, even before physiologists had demonstrated the verity that alcohol abridged, instead of increasing, the temperature of the body, they had erudite that spirits conical their nation to resist farthest cold. “In the Northern regions,” says Edarea Smith, “it was proved that the intact exclusion of spirits was essential, in order to keep intensity under these unpositive conditions.”

Alcohol does not make you sound.

——————————–

If alcohol does not have hankie-fabricateing pertinent, nor give intensity to the body, it cannot maybe add to its power. “Every kind of nation an animal can breed,” says Dr. G. Budd, F.R.S., “the mechanical nation of the muscles, the element (or digestive) nation of the stomach, the intellectual nation of the wits accumurecents through the diet of the organ on which it depends.” Dr. F.R. silt, of Edinburgh, after discussing the mistrust, and educing data, notes: “From the very character of equipment, it will now be seen how imlikely it is that alcohol can be powerening food of both kind. beproduce it cannot become a part of the body, it cannot consequently contribute to its solid, organic power, or permanent nation; and, beproduce it comes out of the body just as it went in, it cannot, by its decomposition, breed intensity compel.”

Sir Benjamin Brodie says: “Stimulants do not establish panicky nation; they purely permit you, as it were, to use up that which is left, and then they effect you more in must of remnants than before.”

mogul Liebig, so far back as 1843, in his “Animal Chemistry,” cutting out the fallacy of alcohol generating nation. He says: “The circulation will occur accelerated at the outlay of the compel open for voluntary wave, but lacking the effection of a larger magnitude of mechanical compel.” In his recentr “lettering,” he again says: “mauve is rather superfluous to man, it is unbrokenly pursueed by the expenditure of nation” while, the honestly affair of food is to give nation. He adds: “These drinks promote the change of count in the body, and are, consequently, atcultivateed by an within failure of nation, which concludes to be effective, beproduce it is not employed in overcoming obvious difficulties i.e., in effective.” In other language, this great chemist asserts that alcohol abstracts the nation of the organism from liability expedient work in the grassland or workshop, in order to clean the house from the defilement of alcohol itself.

The recent Dr. W. Brinton, surgeon to St. Thomas’, in his great work on Dietetics, says: “cautious observation effects little misgiving that a kindrate dose of beer or plum would, in most bags, at once cheapen the most credence which a wholesome self could repeal. Mental acuteness, accuracy of perception and elegance of the witsss are all so far opposite by alcohol, as that the most pains of each are incompatible with the eating of any kindrate quunwillingty of fermented liquid. A separate tumbler will regularly suffice to take the brink off both opinion and body, and to diminish their power to something below their perfection of work.”

Dr. F.R. silt, F.S.A., letters on the specialty of alcohol as a food, makes the next quotation from an essay on “Stimulating Drinks,” available by Dr. H.R. anger, as long ago as 1847: “Alcohol is not the artless incentive to any of our organs, and therefore, affairs performed in consequence of its application, cultivate to debilitate the organ acted ahead.

Alcohol is incompetent of being assimirecentd or converted into any organic proximate notion, and therefore, cannot be considered nutritious.

The power experienced after the use of alcohol is not new power added to the organism, but is manifested by mission into problem the panicky energy pre-untaken.

The crucial exhausting property of alcohol, unsettled to its drink properties, create an unartless susceptibility to sinister action in all the organs, and this, with the surfeit superinduced, becomes a bountiful mine of disease.

A self who habitually exerts himself to such an level as to force the daily use of drinks to area off exhaustion, may be compared to a system effective under high force. He will become greatly more obnoxious to the produces of disease, and will sure stop down rather than he would have done under more positive circumstances.

The more everydayly alcohol is had choice to for the idea of overcoming feelings of weakness, the more it will be forced, and by unbroken repetition a time is at part reached when it cannot be foregone, except retort is simultaneously brought about by a conditioning full change of the routine of life.

motivated to the mass.

——————

Not discovery that alcohol possesses any honest alimentary value, the strength advocates of its use have been obsessed to the assumption that it is a kind of inferior food, in that it has the nation to break the metamorphosis of hankie. “By the metamorphosis of hankie is planned,” says Dr. pursue, “that change which is unbrokenly available on in the organism which involves a unbroken disintegration of pertinent; a breach up and avoiding of that which is no longer aliment, making scope for that new give which is to sustain life.” Another strength critic, in referring to this metamorphosis, says: “The importance of this manner to the maintenance of life is willingly exposed by the adverse property which pursue ahead its disturbance. If the discharge of the excrementitious substances be in any way impeded or hanging, these substances accumurecent both in the blood or hankies, or both. In consequence of this custody and accumulation they become malicious, and fast create a derangement of the critical affairs. Their shape is principally exerted ahead the panicky organism, through which they create most everyday irritability, disturbance of the unique witsss, elation, insensibility, blackout, and lastly, fatality.”

“This description,” notes Dr. pursue, “occurs almost incultivateed for alcohol.” He then says: “To demand alcohol as a food beproduce it breaks the metamorphosis of hankie, is to demand that it in some way suspends the habitual conduct of the laws of assimilation and diet, of surplus and revamp. A primary advocate of alcohol (Hammond) therefore illustrates it: ‘Alcohol retards the destruction of the hankies. By this destruction, compel is breedd, muscles catch, view are urbanized, organs ooze and emit.’ In other language, alcohol interferes with all these. No miracle the creator ‘is not vindicate’ how it does this, and we are not vindicate how such breaked metamorphosis recuperates.

Not an originator of critical compel.

——————————–

which is not known to have any of the regular nation of foods, and use it on the fold assumption that it breaks metamorphosis of hankie, and that such break is conservative of strength, is to condition faint of the bounds of knowledge into the land of reserved possibilities, and grant the label of adjuster ahead an agent whose group is itself misgivingful.

Having futile to associate alcohol as a nitrogenous or non-nitrogenous food, not having found it ampermit to any of the datas by which the food-compel of aliments is commonly assessd, it will not do for us to discourse of profit by break of regressive metamorphosis except such manner is accompanied with something evidential of the verity something scientifically descriptive of its kind of accomplishment in the task at hand, and except it is exposed to be practically enviable for alimentation.

There can be no misgiving that alcohol does produce defects in the manneres of elimination which are artless to the wholesome body and which even in disease are regularly conservative of strength.

This article is the perfect way to gain the information that you need to fully appreciate the complexity of this subject.

Post a Comment


No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment